Anna Diamantopoulou Blog

Switch to desktop Register Login

Article in Greece’s age of monsters, Europe’s age of mutation

A famous quote is attributed to Antonio Gramsci, ancient leader of the Italian Communist Party: “The Old is dead. The new cannot be born. This is the age of monsters”.

For many, Greece’s “age of monsters” began with the result of its recent elections on the 6th of May which saw the electoral collapse of the two main Greek parties – the Socialists and the Conservatives, the entry of the “Golden Dawn” Neo-Nazi party in Parliament and the significant rise of the Radical Left SYRIZA party to the second spot. The inability of the parties to form a viable coalition, especially due to the unwillingness of the radical left, led to new elections that are planned take place on the 17th of June.

However, it is important to properly understand what led to this electoral balkanization.

A short answer is that, in effect, Germany chose to forsake its own past. The Treaty of Versailles, ratified after the end of World War I in 1919 created a dynamic that produced recession, hyperinflation and political instability for the main losing party, Germany. The treaty carried within it the seeds of its own undoing and effectively led to the rise of National Socialism in 1933. After the end of World War II the lesson from the Versailles Treaty was very clear for the Allies. The Marshall Plan, conceived by the American government, led to the reconstruction of Europe and in a matter of decades, Germany was, once more, the locomotive of European growth.


The Memorandum that Greece signed with the IMF and the other member states of the EMU in 2010, while including a set of essential administrative and market reforms, was problematic from a macroeconomic standpoint. However it consisted of the only offered alternative at the time. Putting Greece on a fiscal and monetary ventilator kept the economy of the country alive, albeit in a recessionary spiral. The Greek society initially accepted the terms of the plan, with the tacit hope that as time progressed, necessary modifications would be made that would render the plan more viable. For instance, the plan did not begin with a debt haircut. However debt forgiveness did eventually take place for a part of the Greek debt, in the form of the recent Private Sector Involvement (PSI) agreement. Nevertheless, recession was proving to be worse than expected, quarter after quarter, and new fiscal measures, translated in wage and pension cuts and tax hikes, kept on being introduced, without a clear picture about when this process would end.

Democracy needs time, trust, institutions and structures. None of these elements was in place in the previous years, mainly due to long-term structural weaknesses, but also because of the war-like political climate. Greece has the obligation to move forward with further reforms, with the goal of fully reconstructing its production model.

However, does anyone really believe that Greece, constituting of only 2% of the EMU-wide GDP is the only issue? The question is rhetorical, and despite the national symptoms, this is no national crisis. In effect, it is a structural crisis of the single currency, with different symptoms from Greece, Spain, Italy, Portugal and Ireland – or even for the other member-states. The core of the problem lies at the lack of a proper institutional response.


Selective meetings between 2, 3 or 4 EMU member states lack an institutional rationale. Nonetheless, it might be advantageous to accept that due to the gravity of the circumstances the biggest member states should have some flexibility in their decision-making process – as long as they realize the political responsibility that they are de facto assuming. The preparation for the June 22 Summit in Rome between Italy, France, Germany and Spain requires a first step towards a radical, out-of-the-box agenda. The period of half-measures is over. It’s not only the markets but also the citizens of Europe that require a clear signal of political will instead of further «kicking the can down the road».

Solutions are there: political and fiscal integration, an even more activist monetary policy on behalf of the ECB (with the acceptance of a higher inflationary target), an EiB chapter for the economic development of the crisis-striken South (effectively, a South European Investment Bank), european credit rating agencies. Their adoption – far from being a zero sum game between the North and the South - will send the strongest possible message: that Europe, with its bigger and smaller nations, with stronger and weaker national economies, will further integrate and will stand on its feet once more as a powerful collective global player, instead of a one-country show.                  

This is an SOS moment for the people of Europe. Our only way is forward.

Last modified on
Rate this item
(0 votes)

Anna Diamantopoulou, 2012. Content is distributed with a CC A-NC-ND-Gr-3.0 licence

Top Desktop version